One’s comfort with today’s science of reading seems to depend on which instructional approaches one advocates and what one is willing to accept as determinative evidence. [In] this article, I delve into the nature of the kind of evidence that should be the basis of a science of reading instruction.
Advancing Our Students’ Language and Literacy by Marilyn Jager Adams
If I were writing the headline for the next newspaper story on the SATs, here’s what you’d see: “Seniors and Their SAT Scores Sabotaged by Low-Level Textbooks.” The literacy level of our secondary students is languishing because the kids are not reading what they need to be reading.
Centering Language and Student Voice in Multilingual Literacy Instruction [PDF] by C. Patrick Proctor, Rebecca D. Silverman, and Renata Love Jones
In this article, the authors draw from 3 years of intensive work with multilingual students and their teachers to describe four principles to guide multilingual literacy instruction.
Maximizing Access to Reading Intervention [PDF] by Katharine Pace Miles et al.
The collaboration in this study serves as a model for how academics, and practitioners can join forces and leverage their expertise to reach more students.
Training Pediatric Residents in Literacy Promotion: Residency Directors’ Perspectives by Joanna Elizabeth Kinney et al.
[W]e sought to gain insight into
the current state of literacy promotion education in pediatric residency programs and the barriers faced in educating pediatric residents from the perspective of residency program directors.
“When Students Perform at the Below Basic Level on the NAEP: What Does It Mean and What Can Educators Do?” [PDF] by Elfrieda H. Hiebert
When the National Assessment of Educational Progress in Reading (NAEP) results are published biennially, journalists and policymakers focus on the approximately third of a fourth-grade cohort who fail to attain the basic standard in reading comprehension. A legitimate concern is that these students do not have the literacy levels required for full participation in the global digital world of the 21st century. However, the attributions
and claims of their literacy levels go far beyond this concern. . .
“In the Beginning: The Historical and Conceptual Genesis of the Gradual Release of Responsibility” by P. David Pearson, Mary B. McVee, and Lynn E. Shanahan. [PDF]
Educators are always in search of approaches that promote student development and academic achievement. Engaging learners in purposeful instruction in skills and strategies is a cornerstone in every classroom. The gradual release of responsibility (GRR) model requires the responsibility of learning to shift from being teacher-centric towards students gradually assuming responsibility as independent learners.
“What Does Discussion Add to Reading for Conceptual Learning?” by Pei-Yu Marian Pan, Brian W. Miller, and Richard C. Anderson. [PDF]
Prepared for teachers, school administrators, parents, and other members of the interested public, this summary of Marilyn Jager Adams’ “Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print” selects from the complex and extensive body of research in the book to present a more direct but much less detailed account of
useful, research-based information on beginning reading.
“Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print” by Marilyn Jager Adams. A Summary by Steven A. Stahl et al. [PDF]
Prepared for teachers, school administrators, parents, and other members of the interested public, this summary of Marilyn Jager Adams’ “Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print” selects from the complex and extensive body of research in the book to present a more direct but much less detailed account of
useful, research-based information on beginning reading.
If You’re Going to Write About the Science of Reading, Get Your Science Right by Daniel Willingham
What does the research say about what preservice teachers know about the cognitive and linguistic bases of reading instruction and how to effectively build this knowledge for future teachers?